approaching therapy

musings as they come, and as they evolve …

Archive for the ‘couples’ Category

adding up

without comments

I spoke about communication, and being seen. What is this about? A quality of connection. And there’s a feeling there that people have when it’s good. A good feeling. That’s what people are after. That feeling.

Written by David

January 6th, 2012 at 1:06 am

Posted in couples,individuals

companion

without comments

Seems companionship is important to people.

Written by David

January 6th, 2012 at 1:04 am

Posted in couples,individuals

seen

without comments

I spoke about trust earlier.
Seems being seen is really important to people. The sense that someone gets us. There’s a sense of connection there, like that look across the room, or it doesn’t even have to be that far away. That look and you know, you know you know.

Written by David

December 18th, 2011 at 11:35 pm

Posted in couples

trust

without comments

It seems to be the most important thing in a relationship.
Communication is second, if there is such a thing as second,
because it’s wrapped up with trust.

Written by David

December 10th, 2011 at 7:40 pm

Posted in couples

half the battle

without comments

What a metaphor, “battle.” Not what I want to think of when I think of relationships, but the phrase came to my mind when I was thinking about getting from here to there.

I think that when people finally own their experience and stop the blaming, they are halfway there.

What else is there, then?
Perhaps another eighth is giving to self (empathy), and another eighth is giving to your partner (including compassion).

And then perhaps the last quarter is actually practicing some new ways of being, like communicating directly and honestly what’s going on, when it’s going on.

Written by David

June 5th, 2011 at 1:27 pm

Posted in couples

attachment vs differentiation and communication skills

without comments

Will “validation of someone else’s feelings” interfere with that other person’s spiritual growth and foster a dependent sense of self?
Will it “reinforce the problem“, as David Schnarch writes?

I do like the point behind Schnarch’s exhortation: “Stop trying to get your partner to listen to you (or validate you); listen to yourself!”

And I agree when Schnarch says we gotta learn to self-soothe and regulate our own anxiety and connect with our core.

And I agree with his suggestion that people can’t do this for each other so easily when they themselves are activated. You gotta attend to your own needs.

But my understanding of communication skills includes more than just “reciprocal validation.”
I like the Nonviolent Communication (NVC) model, because it’s really about a state of consciousness, which is then reflected in the way one communicates

By consciousnesses, I mean seeing our connectedness to each other, understanding and connecting with each others’ needs, and the compassion and the desire to contribute to others’ well-being that naturally arises from that perception. Communication techniques can also increase the chance the we will get our needs met — not a bad thing, eh? NVC is also very much about empathy, not only for others but for ourselves, which I see as a form of taking care of yourself.

The NVC model looks at underlying needs. Honoring them and finding ways to meet everyone’s needs. Schnarch’s model seems to be about learning to stand on our own two feet, but I also wonder if his gives a nod to the notion that with respect to some needs, we may be interdependent?

Do we need others to help us meet our needs for appreciation? for love? for companionship?

Is it’s like what Thich Nhat Hanh supposedly said: “Love is available; help yourself !” ??

Written by David

October 12th, 2010 at 10:36 am

Posted in couples

once a week

without comments

Some therapists insist that folks come once a week.
Good reasons, too.
To keep momentum.
To stay involved and effective.

But I’m for whatever works.

But I’m noticing that sometimes if people don’t come once a week, then progress isn’t made.
It’s more about fire extinguishing.

If a couple can’t make it once a week because they are too busy, then that might be a part of the problem — or challenge.

They are too busy to nurture their relationship?
And yet they are hoping that things will change someday, somehow.

Yes, things will change, no matter what you do.
But they might not change in the way you might be hoping.
I think it really helps to water the relationship.

Written by David

October 11th, 2010 at 10:05 pm

Posted in couples

4 questions 1 decision

without comments

Casey Truffo got these questions from Andrea Lee.
Below, I’m quoting Casey verbatim, who is partly quoting Andrea, but I changed one word. From business to relationship.

1. What is it you want for your relationship?

2. What is important to you?

3. What might you let stop you?

4. How can you prevent that from happening?

How do you break through a current obstacle that’s keeping you from where you want to be or even who you want to be.

Andrea Lee says,
A breakthrough is not a process, but a decision.
A decision to not stop yourself.
A decision to go for it.

Are you ready to be done with what is stopping you?

Written by David

October 11th, 2010 at 9:57 pm

Posted in couples,individuals

be nice

without comments

When a couple left the other night, I asked them to please
“be compassionate towards each other; be nice to each other.”

Written by David

October 11th, 2010 at 9:45 pm

Posted in couples

don’t be nice – be real

without comments

That’s the title of a book by Kelly Bryson. I really do admire his work and perspective.

And then I read this quote in Illusions: The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah, by Richard Bach. New York: Dell Publishing, 1977, p. 59:

Your only obligation in any lifetime is to be true to yourself.

But I like to question things.
So I ask, “really?”

Is that true for you?
If you can’t speak your truth, would you rather be dead?
Live free or die?

For you, are there some needs which may be more important than authenticity?
How about safety? A roof over your head?
Would you choose to hold your tongue in exchange for what scraps you do get in your relationship with your partner?

It’s easy for therapists to exhort people to “be authentic” and to suggest to them that they aren’t responsible for someone else’s reactions.

But just b/c you aren’t responsible for someone else’s experience doesn’t mean you don’t have to deal with that other person’s reactions. It’s what my teacher Judye Hesse calls the game of “truth AND consequences.”

What if you tell your partner that you love him and then he withdraws because he’s afraid to allow himself to receive love for fear that if he allows himself to receive, then he’ll also allow the possibility of loss, and now he’s admitted vulnerability, and that’s not a position he wants to put himself in. Or what if he yells at you back and tells you to stop taking care of him, and gives you the icy shoulder for three days?

Or what if you tell your partner you are disappointed that you didn’t get to spend some time with him this weekend and he just turns it back on you and gets on your case for the time you went out with a friend of yours two months ago, and he won’t stop yelling at you until he’s had the last word. Is it worth it to say anything?

Would you stay in this relationship? Would you rather be alone?

Sure, you can take responsibility for your own experience — you can try and manage what comes up in you in the face of your partner’s reactive display and soothe yourself. But how much tension and coldness can you stand?
And sure, you can always heed Jim Morrison’s advice and just “walk out of town.”

Written by David

October 11th, 2010 at 9:39 pm

Switch to our mobile site